Introduction

The right of access to court files is a cornerstone of transparency andaccountability within the judicial system. However, this right is not absoluteand may be curtailed under specific circumstances, particularly when theinformation contained within the files is of a confidential nature. In therealm of tax law, the duty of confidentiality is a crucial component designedto safeguard taxpayer privacy. Yet, this duty can intersect with the right ofaccess to court files, as these files may encompass sensitive tax-relatedinformation. This paper explores the duty of confidentiality in tax law and itsimplications on the right of access to court files.

‍

The Duty of Confidentiality in Tax Law

The duty of confidentiality in tax law is typically codified instatutes. Such statutes delineate both the categories of information deemedconfidential and the individuals or entities subject to this duty. Typically,this duty is imposed upon tax authorities, as well as their personnel andagents. Furthermore, it may extend to other parties like accountants andlawyers who possess access to confidential tax-related information. Generally,the duty of confidentiality is absolute, precluding the disclosure ofinformation without the taxpayer's consent. However, certain exceptions exist,allowing disclosure when necessary for the enforcement of tax laws or theprotection of public interest.

‍

The Right of Access to Court Files Involving Tax Information

In cases involving tax-related information, the right to access courtfiles may be constrained. The court faces the task of striking a balancebetween the right of access, the duty of confidentiality, and other pertinentfactors, including taxpayer privacy and public interest. Considerations include:

• The applicant's interest in accessing the information.
• The interests of involved parties and those potentially impacted by access.
• Allocation of resources needed for access.
• The duty of confidentiality binding the tax authority.

Should the court determine that the right of access outweighs competingfactors, the request is likely to be granted. Conversely, if other factorscarry more weight, the access request may be denied.

‍

Conclusion

Harmonizing the duty of confidentiality in tax law with the right ofaccess to court files necessitates a meticulous assessment of all pertinentfactors. The court's responsibility is to deliberate thoughtfully in each case,ensuring an equitable resolution. This equilibrium ensures justice is servedwhile upholding principles of privacy and accountability.